Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home prices. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Is Now A Good Time to Buy or Sell Real Estate?

Many of us, who are contemplating buying or selling real estate, are trying to predict the market and reduce our risk of making a bad financial decision.

A question is usually asked, "Is now a good time to buy or sell real estate, especially a residence?"

The simple answer is, "It depends." Allow me to explain...


Price Pressures

As everyone knows, due to changes in lending practices which make it harder for buyers to obtain a loan, there are fewer qualified buyers. Those buyers that are actively looking now have the luxury to take their time, believing that if they wait a little longer they may benefit from lower prices or another house coming on the market that is closer to their specification.

Investors, who were previously able to purchase and obtain loans with little or no money down, are now required to make significant down payments, which greatly restricts those who were speculating and making money solely off of the rapid appreciation of the property (and which forced some areas into hyper price escalation) that was not based on sound investment fundamentals.

As a result of the previous loose lending practices we are facing more foreclosures, mainly from owners and investors who never should have been given a loan in the first place, increasing the supply of houses for sale that are discounted (to quickly move them off the books of the loan organizations).

In addition, builders over the past several years were building more houses than the demand and eventually increased new homes for sale to about a year's worth of excess inventory. The number of people who are putting their home on the market has not drastically decreased to offset the excess inventory from overbuilding, foreclosures and longer selling lead times.

Rental rates, which have increased over the years, have either stabilized or decreased as those who have to vacate their home, because of new job location or retirement, are not able to sell; so their are renting to cover the mortgage, real estate taxes and other property costs, building up equity hoping the market will eventually improve and they can then sell. This increase of rental supply as well as willingness (or ability or need) to take less than the market price in order to entice renters has kept increases in rental rates at bay even though there are more people renting. This means that investors will tend to pay less for the purchase of a residential rental property because of the potential for limited or reduced revenue per property and they will not likely to realize gains in the short term from property appreciation.

At the same time, you have various other economic forces at work resulting in the weakening value of the dollar coupled with increasing energy costs, which tends to drive up prices over the long term.

Obviously, a decision to buy or sell should be determined in light of your total financial situation and preferably with advice of your financial and possibly even you legal advisors.

Given that you have concluded that your best option is to buy or sell, then when is the best time?

Most people can observe that the real estate residential real estate market has slowed -- prices in general (although not in all areas) are decreasing as the percentage of available homes sold are also decreasing. Some are believing there was a "bubble" that reached it's peak in 2005 and is nearing a bottoming out. Others see the "bubble" as an anomaly that has to be corrected over several years in order to bring it back on line with the average historical sales price that has always trended gradually upward.

It's important to understand that there are many variables to selling and buying house and you can never eliminate all risk. But you can help yourself to minimize your risks when buying and/or selling.


Assumptions

I'm making the following assumptions regarding market trends and pricing...

1. We are currently on a negative trend regarding pricing and length of time to sell (which will continue at least until excess inventory is sold).

2. Historically, over more than 100 years, average U.S. housing prices, while fluctuating, have gradually increased overall, which tends to correlate inversely to the declining buying power of the dollar. In that sense it can be seen as a long-term hedge against inflation.

3. While the growing size of the U.S. population will increase demand for property, the fact that property is finite and available land for development is shrinking will not dampen strong negative trends, but in the long-term should work to place upward pressure on real estate prices.

4. Properties, especially homes in which you live or commercial property out of which you work, that can be maintained within your budget are a good investment as they allow you over many years to build equity. In addition, you have the benefits derived from your personal use of the property that provides much qualitative value in addition to the quantitative value.

5. To get the maximum appreciation benefit out of a property, you should be prepared to hold on to it for ten or more years.

6. Buyer resistance results in falling prices that continue until they reach levels buyers are willing to pay (buyer support levels) which can be determined by looking at three fundamentals: price to income, replacement cost, and investment asset valuation.

7. First-time property buyers have the greatest advantages and potential gains in a falling (buyer's) market. While sellers are at a disadvantage in that market, they will more than likely gain it back if they are buying a property to replace what they are selling. In which case they will tend to at least break even on the total of both transactions.

8. Short of a major economic or worldwide catastrophe, any changes in real estate pricing will take place gradually over months and years. Therefore, once you know if the trend is up or down you can react in a reasonable time frame and not be overly concerned about quick fluctuations in price. You can therefore safely assume that, within a limited purchase window of one to three months, a property is reasonably priced for the current market.


The Basics

It now all goes back to focusing on the the basics under the guidance of a qualified and experienced real estate agent...

1. Is property reasonably priced for the area in which it is located and the conditions?



  • In general, what is the market value of the property (ideally using 3 months or less sales figures for comparatives)?

  • Do the three pricing fundamentals (price to income, replacement costs, investment asset valuation) confirm the market value?

  • Sellers need to be aware of comparable properties currently for sale as that's their competition.

2. Can the buyer afford the property? (If primarily an investment, do the financial numbers work?)

3. Does the property fit most, if not all, of buyer's requirements (features, location, community, access to work, markets, etc.)?

4. Is the negotiated sales price reasonable for both sides?



  • Determine your own and at least estimate the other side's breakeven point.

  • Be aware of opportunity costs and potential benefits involved in the timing of a decision. (e.g., often it makes more financial sense to accept a price that is not our ideal in order to secure a sales contract sooner and minimize ongoing costs that will be avoided upon close of the transaction.)

5. Perform proper due diligence, inspections and transaction processing.


While in general I believe it is better to buy than rent, there are situations, such as not being in one area long enough to obtain any appreciation benefits or not sure if location is appropriate that it makes sense to first rent for a short period of time until you can determine appropriateness of purchasing property. (Click here for Renter Center and "Buy vs. Rent" calculators.)


NOTE: This is a overview look at the issues surrounding real estate markets and property prices. I will be expanding and further clarifying this topic in follow up articles.


Additional Resources:

Housing Price Index (OFHEO)


House Value Fundamentals


Housing Crisis Over, According to Wall Street Journal

Charts and Graphs:

Inflation Adjusted Historical Housing Prices

History of Home Values (NY Times)

Median and Average Sale Prices of New Homes

Historical Median Home Values (Census Bureau)

American Housing Survey (HUD / Census Bureau)


Depending on whether you are buying and/or selling a house, here are links to resources talking about the process I trust you will find helpful:

The Process of Selling Your Home

The Process of Buying Your Home





Visit my web site for additional real estate services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com [NJ/PA]

and visit
Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).


Copyright 2008 by Lawrence Yerkes. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

U.S. Monthly House Price Index Fell 0.8 Pct.

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. home prices fell 0.8 percent on a seasonally-adjusted basis from March to April, according to OFHEO’s monthly House Price Index. For the 12 months ending in April, U.S. prices fell 4.6 percent. As April 2007 was the peak of the monthly HPI, 4.6 percent is also the total fall from the peak.

More details...


Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com [NJ/PA]

and visit
Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2008 by Lawrence Yerkes. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

NAR Forecast: Home Sales, Prices to Pick Up in Second Half of 2008

Home sales and prices throughout most of the country are poised for improvement in the second half of 2008, and the recovery will vary by market, Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of REALTORS®(NAR) said today during NAR’s Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo. More than 9,000 REALTORS® and guests are attending the conference that runs here through Saturday.

Middle-America cities that performed evenly over the past few years – like Cincinnati, Milwaukee and the Kansas City, Mo., area – are likely to experience home price gains in the 20 to 30 percent range over the next five years, while markets like Miami, Las Vegas and Phoenix could see prices go up as much as 50 percent during that time period, Yun said.

Yun blamed most of the softening of the housing market over the last year on the “subprime mess,” where consumers with blemished credit records got loans they couldn’t afford when the interest rates reset to higher levels.

“In fact, if you look at where home prices fell the most, it’s the markets were subprime loans were prevalent,” Yun said. Cape Coral, Fla.; Detroit; Las Vegas; Miami; Orlando, Fla.; Phoenix and Riverside, Calif. were among the cities with a high percentage of subprime lending and where the markets suffered the biggest downturns, he explained.

“It’s important to keep things in context,” he said. “While much of the media is focusing on the fact that the rate of foreclosures doubled this year from historic averages, the foreclosure rate has gone from 1 percent of all homeowners with mortgages to 2 percent. Foreclosures are being driven principally by subprime loans.”

He further explained that more than half of today’s foreclosures are concentrated in the subprime market. The great majority of homeowners are making their mortgage payments on time.

Now that the subprime market has dried up, and loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration and those purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are making a comeback, the housing markets will strengthen and prices are likely to begin a steady uptick in the coming months, Yun said.

Yun urged the Congress and White House to enact NAR-supported legislation to modernize FHA programs, reform regulation of the government-sponsored enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac), establish a first-time home buyer tax credit, and make the temporary increases to the conforming loan limits established by the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 permanent.

“These measures would quickly stabilize the housing markets and get fence-sitters into the market to buy homes,” Yun said.

“There are many reasons for people to get into the housing market today, and very few reasons not to. With the plentiful supply of homes for sale at affordable prices, interest rates approaching 40-year lows, and the strong track record of housing as a good long-term investment, conditions are ripe for buyers,” he added. “Those are the facts, plain and simple.”

As for a recession, it’s not happening, Yun said. “A slowdown, yes, but the definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. It’s not in the cards – no matter how you look at it.”

The National Association of REALTORS®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.2 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.



Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com [NJ/PA]

and visit
Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2008 by Lawrence Yerkes. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

NAR: Metro Areas Show Greatly Mixed Home Median Price Changes With Half Showing Gains

WASHINGTON - Roughly half of metropolitan areas continued to show rising home prices in the fourth quarter of 2007, according to the latest quarterly survey by the National Association of Realtors®(NAR).

In the fourth quarter, 73 out of 150 metropolitan statistical areas(1) show increases in median existing single-family home prices from a year earlier, including 11 areas with double-digit annual gains and another 12 metros showing increases of 6 percent or more; 77 had price declines including 16 with double-digit drops.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said disruptions in the mortgage market have played a role. “The continuing crunch in the jumbo loan market that began in August has disproportionately reduced the number of transactions in higher price ranges,” he said. “For buyers who need loans of more than $417,000, mortgage interest rates have been running more than a percentage point higher, and that has been having an obvious impact. Higher ratios of sales for more moderately priced homes are naturally dampening the national median price as well as the data for some of the more expensive markets.”

NAR’s track of metro area single-family home prices is the largest published series of metropolitan home prices, with data available back to 1979. The metro home price series treats all homes equally, without placing higher weights on more expensive homes as in other home price series. (
See NAR Metro Area price charts.)

The disruption in higher priced sales continues to drag down the aggregate national median existing single-family home price, which was $206,200 in the fourth quarter, down 5.8 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006 when the median price was $219,000. The national median normally is a typical market price, where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less.

NAR President Richard Gaylord, a broker with RE/MAX Real Estate Specialists in Long Beach, Calif., said he is encouraged with plans to increase conventional loan limits. “Higher limits for FHA loans, which go into effect March 14, will be a big help to first-time buyers in high-cost markets. Higher limits for conventional loans purchased by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will take a bit longer – when they become available, high-income, creditworthy borrowers in high-cost areas will have access to affordable and safer financing, and that will help unleash pent-up demand,” he said.

“With the market in a state of flux, it’s especially important for consumers to stay abreast of widely varying and changing market conditions. We encourage them to have a traditional long-term view, which means taking the time to thoughtfully research the market. More than ever, the best resource is a Realtor® who can put local conditions in perspective, provide advice and negotiate the transaction.”

Despite the annual decline in the fourth quarter median home price, the typical seller who purchased their home six years ago still saw a very healthy gain. The median increase in value for sellers who purchased that home in the fourth quarter of 2001 is 31.2 percent, and the median home equity accumulation is $49,000.

In the fourth quarter, the largest single-family home price increase was the Cumberland area of Maryland and West Virginia, where the median price of $116,600 rose 19.0 percent from a year ago. Next was Yakima, Wash., at $170,600, up 18.0 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006, followed by the Binghamton, N.Y., area, where the fourth quarter median price increased 14.8 percent to $110,000.

“The healthiest housing markets today generally are moderately priced and are experiencing job growth and often population growth, which in turn is supporting strong price growth,” Yun said. “Most of the weakest markets have either experienced both job and population losses, or they are experiencing corrections following a prolonged period of rapid price growth.”

Median fourth-quarter metro area single-family home prices ranged from a very affordable $72,600 in the Youngstown-Warren-Boardman area of Ohio and Pennsylvania, to nearly 12 times that amount in the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara area of California, where the median price was $845,300. The second most expensive area was San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, at $777,300, followed by the Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine area (Orange County, Calif.), at $657,400.

Other affordable markets include the Saginaw-Saginaw Township North area of Michigan, with a fourth-quarter median price of $74,900, and Decatur, Ill., at $75,000.

In the condo sector, metro area condominium and cooperative prices – covering changes in 59 metro areas – show the national median existing-condo price was $221,100 in the fourth quarter, essentially unchanged from $221,200 in the fourth quarter of 2006. Thirty-three metros showed annual increases in the median condo price, including four areas with double-digit gains; 26 areas had price declines including four with double-digit drops.

The strongest condo price increases were in Bismarck, N.D., where the fourth quarter price of $125,000 rose 20.8 percent from a year earlier, followed by the New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner area of Louisiana, at $173,300, up 17.8 percent, and Knoxville, Tenn., where the median condo price of $160,800 rose 10.6 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006.

Metro area median existing-condo prices in the fourth quarter ranged from $109,900 in Wichita, Kan., to $595,700 in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont area. The second most expensive condo market reported was Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, at $363,100, followed by the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos area at $327,000.

Other affordable condo markets include both Indianapolis and Greensboro-High Point, N.C., at $116,700 in the fourth quarter, and the Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor area of Ohio at $120,000.

Total state existing-home sales, including single-family and condo, were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate(2) of 4.96 million units in the fourth quarter, down 8.5 percent from 5.42 million in the third quarter, and are 20.9 percent below a 6.26 million-unit pace in the fourth quarter of 2006. “With prior reports of national home sales declines, it is not surprising to see 14 states with declines in excess of 20 percent from a year ago,” Yun noted.

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate on a 30-year conventional fixed-rate mortgage fell to 6.23 percent in the fourth quarter from 6.55 percent in the third quarter; the rate was 6.25 percent in the fourth quarter of 2006. In recent weeks, Freddie Mac has been reporting the 30-year fixed rate to be under 5.7 percent.

Regionally, the median existing single-family home price in the Midwest declined 3.2 percent to $156,300 in the fourth quarter from the same period in 2006. The strongest metro price increase in the Midwest was in the Springfield, Ill., area, where the median price of $108,600 was 14.4 percent higher than a year ago. Next was Bismarck, N.D., at $144,700, up 13.5 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006, and Waterloo-Cedar Falls, Iowa, at $115,400, up 12.1 percent.

In the Northeast, the median existing single-family home price fell 4.8 percent to $261,700 in the fourth quarter from the same period 2006. After Binghamton, the strongest price increase in the Northeast was in Atlantic City, N.J., at $278,800, up 10.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006, followed by the Syracuse, N.Y., area, with a median price of $126,300, up 9.4 percent.

The median existing single-family home price in the South was $171,700 in the fourth quarter, down 5.4 percent from a year earlier. After Cumberland, the strongest price increase in the South was in Amarillo, Texas, at $120,200, up 11.0 percent from a year ago, followed by the Oklahoma City area with an 8.2 percent gain to $133,800, and the San Antonio area, at $151,700, up 7.9 percent.

In the West, the median existing single-family home price was $324,100 in the fourth quarter, which is 8.7 percent below a year ago. After Yakima, the strongest metro price increase in the West was in the Kennewick-Richland-Pasco area of Washington, at $172,400, up 14.0 percent from a year ago, followed by the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara area, up 11.2 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

(1) Areas are generally metropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. A list of counties included in MSA definitions is available at:
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/metro-city/0312msa.txt

Regional median home prices include rural areas and samples of many smaller metros that are not included in this report; the regional percentage changes do not necessarily parallel changes in the larger metro areas. The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to seasonality in buying patterns. Quarter-to-quarter comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns.

NAR began tracking of metropolitan area median single-family home prices in 1979; the metro area condo price series was launched at the beginning of 2006, with several years of historic data.

Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price sometimes is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes. As the reporting sample expands in the future, additional area will be included in the condo price report.

Tables of metropolitan area median prices, percent changes and some historic data are available at the site below – under Research click on Housing Statistics, then scroll down the center to Metropolitan Area Prices.

(2) The seasonally adjusted annual rate for a particular quarter represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative sales pace for that quarter was maintained for four consecutive quarters. Total home sales include single family, townhomes, condominiums and co-operative housing. NAR began tracking the state sales series in 1981.

Seasonally adjusted rates are used in reporting quarterly data to factor out seasonal variations in resale activity. For example, sales volume normally is higher in the summer and relatively light in winter, primarily because of differences in the weather and household buying patterns.

Tables of state resale rates, percent changes and some historic data are available at the site below under Research – click on Housing Statistics, then scroll down the center to State Existing-Home Sales.

First quarter metro home price and state resale data will be released May 13.




Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com [PA]

Copyright 2008 by Lawrence Yerkes. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Home Prices To Recover in 2008 as Inventories Decline

WASHINGTON - Home prices are expected to recover in 2008 with existing-home sales picking up late this year and new-home sales rising early next year, according to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors®(NAR).

Lawrence Yun, NAR senior economist, said a good buyers’ market has evolved.
“Buyers now have an overwhelming advantage given the wide selection of homes available in many markets,” he said. “But with profit margins coming under pressure, homebuilders will limit new construction well into 2008. This should help the overall inventory level to move steadily into a more balanced state.”

Existing-home sales are expected to total 6.11 million this year and 6.37 million in 2008, down from 6.48 million last year. New-home sales are projected at 865,000 in 2007 and 878,000 next year, compared with 1.05 million in 2006. Housing starts, including multifamily units, are forecast at 1.43 million units this year and 1.44 million in 2008, down from 1.80 million last year.

Existing-home prices are likely to rise 1.8 percent to a median of $222,700 in 2008 after a 1.4 percent decline this year to $218,800. The median new-home price should rise 2.2 percent to $245,400 next year following a 2.6 percent drop in 2007 to $240,100.

“Markets that sharply reduce new construction in 2007 will generally experience respectable price increases in 2008,” Yun said. “Local conditions vary considerably, but with historically low mortgage interest rates this summer and sustained job gains, it could be a good time for first-time buyers with a long-term view to test the housing waters.”

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is estimated to average 6.7 percent during the second half of this year, and fluctuate around 6.6 percent in 2008.

Growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) will probably be 2.0 percent in 2007, compared with a 3.3 percent growth rate last year; GDP is forecast to grow 2.8 percent in 2008.

The unemployment rate is likely to average 4.6 percent in 2007, unchanged from last year. Inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, is projected at 2.6 percent in 2007, down from 3.2 percent last year. Inflation-adjusted disposable personal income should rise 3.0 percent this year, up from a 2.6 percent gain in 2006.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
# # #
Existing-home sales for June will be released July 25; the Pending Home Sales Index is scheduled for August 1 and the next forecast will be August 8.





Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2007 by Lawrence Yerkes. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

Home Price Changes - Top 20 Markets

Property values are falling overall in the United States, but the change is anything but evenly spread. This interactive map shows changes in house prices in 20 large markets in 2006-2007, and in recent months. (Source: Bankrate.com)

Full Story . . .



Visit my web site for additional services and support:
LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2007 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Metro Home Prices and State Sales Bottoming Out

NAR: Fourth Quarter Metro Home Prices & State Sales Likely Have Hit Bottom

WASHINGTON, February 15, 2007 - Existing-home sales in most states were down from year-ago levels in the fourth quarter, marking the likely bottom for the current housing cycle, while prices in many areas corrected as a result of sellers’ willingness to negotiate, according to the latest quarterly surveys by the National Association of Realtors®(NAR).

Total state existing-home sales, including single-family and condo, were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (1) of 6.24 million units in the fourth quarter, down 10.1 percent from a 6.94 million-unit level in the fourth quarter of 2005. Even with the general decline, six states showed increases in the sales pace from a year ago and one was unchanged. Complete data for three states were not available.

In the fourth-quarter, metro area single-family home prices, examining changes in 149 metropolitan statistical areas, (2) show 71 areas had price gains from a year earlier, including 14 metros with double-digit annual increases, and 73 areas had price declines; five were unchanged.

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said it appears the fourth quarter was the bottom for the current housing cycle. “This information confirms 2006 was the year of contraction, and hopefully the fourth quarter was the bottom of this current business cycle,” he said. “Home sales are leveling at historically high levels, and examination of data within the quarter shows home prices stabilizing toward the end. When we get the figures for this spring, I expect to see a discernable improvement in both sales and prices.”

The national median existing single-family home price was $219,300 in the fourth quarter, down 2.7 percent from a year earlier when the median price was $225,300. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less. For all of 2006, the median price rose 1.4 percent to $222,000.

A new comparison of annual single-family home prices in metropolitan areas shows that typical sellers experienced healthy gains on the value of their home over the last five years in almost all 131 available areas, even in areas with recent price declines.

NAR President Pat Vredevoogd Combs said a broader view of home prices is necessary because housing is a long-term investment. “Since the typical owner stays in a home for six years, it’s more useful to look at the five-year comparison for metro area home prices – most of them are seeing strong gains,” she said. The median five-year price gain is 41.8 percent.

Combs said there’s a lag in measuring market conditions. “The fourth quarter data is showing us recent history, but right now, buyers are responding to seller pricing and incentives, and there’s a bit of a pent-up demand as a result of buyer hesitation during the second half of 2006. We’re not looking for big changes, but a gradual rise in sales and home prices is projected – that will be good for the overall housing market and related industries.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate on a 30-year conventional fixed-rate mortgage was 6.25 percent in the fourth quarter, down from 6.56 percent in the third quarter; the rate was 6.22 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005.

The biggest total sales increase was in Indiana, where existing-home sales rose 13.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 2005. In Arkansas the fourth-quarter resale pace rose 11.1 percent from a year earlier, while Texas experienced the third strongest gain, up 6.2 percent.

Over the last five years, metro areas with the largest single-family price gains include the California areas of Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, up 155.3 percent, and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, up 142.3 percent, followed by the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach area of Florida, up 135.4 percent.

In the fourth quarter, the largest single-family home price increase was in the Atlantic City, N.J., area, where the median price of $339,800 was 25.9 percent higher than a year ago. Next was the Salt Lake City area, at $223,600, up 22.7 percent from the fourth quarter of 2005. The Trenton-Ewing area of New Jersey, with a fourth quarter median price of $289,000, increased 18.9 percent in the last year.

Regionally, the Northeast saw an existing-home sales pace of 1.04 million units in the fourth quarter, which was 6.6 percent below a year ago. The median Northeastern resale single-family home price was $274,600 in the fourth quarter, which is 2.5 percent below the same period in 2005.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

(1)The seasonally adjusted annual rate for a particular quarter represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative sales pace for that quarter was maintained for four consecutive quarters. Total home sales include single family, townhomes, condominiums and co-operative housing. NAR began tracking the state sales



Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2007 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Outer Suburbs Hardest Hit In Current Real Estate Market

While the US housing has adversely affected real estate markets around the nation, far-flung suburbs of major cities have suffered the most abrupt market correction, experiencing the biggest decline in price and sales since summer of 2005. Home construction in these distant exurbs has slowed and prices and sales have fallen more than those of close-in suburban neighbors since a five-year US housing boom ended in the summer of 2005. Average home prices in Loudoun County, Virginia, 35 miles outside of Washington, DC, fell roughly 11% in 2006, according to the Northern Virginia Association of REALTORS®. By contrast, Virginia's Arlington County, which hugs the nation's capital, saw a price decline of only about 2%. (Source: CNNMoney)


Click here for full story about "exburbs" prices and sales trends since 2005



Visit my web site for additional services and support:
LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2007 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Gradual Rise Projected for Home Sales

WASHINGTON - After bottoming in the fourth quarter of 2006, existing-home sales are forecast to gradually rise through 2007 and into 2008, while new-home sales should turnaround by summer, according to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said annual totals for existing-home sales will be fairly comparable between 2006 and 2007. “We have to keep in mind that we were still in boom conditions during the first quarter of 2006 with a high sales volume and double-digit price appreciation,” he said. “We are starting 2007 from a relatively low point, so even with a gradual improvement in sales it’ll be pretty much of a wash in terms of annual totals. The good news is that the steady improvement in sales will support price appreciation moving forward.”

Existing-home sales for 2006 are expected to come in at 6.50 million, the third highest on record, with a total of 6.42 million seen in 2007. New-home sales in 2006 should tally 1.06 million, the fourth highest on record, with 957,000 projected this year.

Total housing starts for 2006 are likely to be 1.81 million units, with 1.51 million forecast in 2007, which would be the lowest level in a decade. Builders are pulling back on new construction to support prices of remaining inventory.

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage will probably rise to 6.7 percent by the fourth quarter of 2007. Last week, Freddie Mac reported the 30-year fixed rate at 6.18 percent – far below earlier consensus forecasts. “The current interest rate environment and housing inventory levels present a window of opportunity for potential buyers,” Lereah said.

The national median existing-home price for all of 2006 is expected to rise 1.1 percent to $222,100, and then gain 1.5 percent this year to $225,300. The median new-home price, after rising only 0.3 percent to $241,600 in 2006, is projected to grow 3.0 percent in 2007 to $248,900.

“With all the wild projections by academics, Wall Street analysts and others in the media, it appears that much of the housing sector is experiencing a soft landing,” Lereah said. “Despite the doomsayers, household wealth will not evaporate and the economy will not go into a recession. If you’re in it for the long haul, housing is a sound investment.”

The unemployment rate is likely to average 4.8 percent this year, following a rate of 4.6 percent in 2006. Inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, is expected to be 2.2 percent 2007, down from 3.2 percent last year, while growth in the U.S. gross domestic product is seen at 2.5 percent in 2007, compared with 3.3 percent last year. Inflation-adjusted disposable personal income should grow 3.4 percent this year, following a rise of 2.7 percent in 2006.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

Existing-home sales for December will be released January 25; the Pending Home Sales Index is scheduled for February 1 and the next forecast will be February 7.

Information about NAR is available at http://www.realtor.org. This and other news releases are posted in the News Media section. Statistical data, charts and surveys also may be found by clicking on Research.



Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2007 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Monday, November 20, 2006

Market Transition Confirmed by 3rd-Quarter Metro Home Prices and State Sales

WASHINGTON, November 20, 2006 - Conditions for home buyers improved during the third quarter as existing single-family home prices in many metropolitan areas experienced corrections, and most states saw sales activity below a year ago which helped to build housing inventories, according to the latest quarterly surveys by the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

Total state existing-home sales, including single-family and condo, were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (1) of 6.27 million units in the third quarter, down 12.7 percent from a 7.18 million-unit pace in the third quarter of 2005 – the second highest level on record, after a peak of 7.19 million in the second quarter of last year. Even with the overall decline, 10 states showed increases in sales activity from a year ago.

Third-quarter metro area single-family home prices, examining changes in 148 metropolitan statistical areas, (2) show 102 areas had price gains, including 21 metros with double-digit annual increases, and 45 areas experiencing price declines; one was unchanged.

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said market conditions are nearly the opposite of a year ago. “Last year we had a record sales market and historically tight supplies of homes with buyers bidding over the asking price,” he said. “With the market in full transition, buyers now have choices and sellers are more willing to negotiate – under these circumstances it’s no surprise that overall home prices are slightly below a year ago. We expect this trend to continue in the months ahead, but we’ll see modest appreciation in most of the country in 2007.”

The national median existing single-family home price was $224,900 in the third quarter, down 1.2 percent from a year earlier when the median price was $227,600. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less.

NAR President
Pat Vredevoogd Combs, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and vice president of Coldwell Banker-AJS-Schmidt, said the market transition is good news for home buyers. “With the supply of homes at the highest level in over a decade and historically low mortgage interest rates, it’s become a great time to buy a home,” said Combs. “This window of opportunity will continue into the new year, but inventories are starting to decline and sellers will be less willing to negotiate when conditions begin to balance in most areas around early spring.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate on a 30-year conventional fixed-rate mortgage was 6.56 percent in the third quarter, down from 6.60 percent in the second quarter; the rate was 5.76 percent in the third quarter of 2005. Last week, Freddie Mac reported the 30-year fixed rate was down to 6.24 percent.

The biggest total sales increase was in North Carolina, where existing-home sales rose 9.7 percent from the third quarter of 2005. In Texas the third-quarter resale pace rose 8.6 percent from a year earlier, while Montana experienced the third strongest gain, up 6.4 percent.

The largest single-family home price increase was in the Salem, Ore., area, where the third quarter price of $228,000 was 24.7 percent higher than a year ago. Next was Elmira, N.Y., at $93,600, up 21.4 percent from the third quarter of 2005. The Salt Lake City area, with a third quarter median price of $216,300, increased 19.2 percent in the last year.

Median third-quarter metro area single-family prices ranged from a very affordable $86,000 in both Decatur, Ill., and the Youngstown-Warren-Boardman area of Ohio and Pennsylvania, to nearly nine times that amount in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont area where the median price was $749,400. The second most expensive area was the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara area of California, at $747,400, followed by the Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine area (Orange Co., Calif.), at $705,000.

In addition to Elmira, N.Y., other affordable markets include South Bend-Mishawaka, Ind., with a third-quarter median price of $96,000, and the Cumberland area of Maryland and West Virginia at $100,900.

In the condo sector,
metro area condominium and cooperative prices – covering changes in 57 markets – show the national median existing condo price was $222,900 in the third quarter, down 2.1 percent from the same period in 2005. Thirty-one metros showed annual increases in the median condo price, including eight areas with double-digit gains; 27 metros had price declines.

The strongest condo price gains were in the Knoxville, Tenn., area, where the third quarter price of $155,700 rose 29.0 percent from a year ago. In Wichita, Kan., the median condo price of $130,300 rose 25.5 percent from the third quarter of 2005, while Albuquerque, N.M., at $153,300, increased 21.0 percent.

Metro area median existing condo prices in the third quarter ranged from $108,200 in Rochester, N.Y., to $600,600 in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont area. The second most expensive reported condo market was Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, at $384,500, followed by the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos area of California at $361,100.
Other affordable condo markets include Bismarck, N.D., at $109,000, and Greensboro-High Point, N.C., at $113,000.

Regionally, the Northeast saw an existing-home sales pace of 1.05 million units in the third quarter, which was 12.5 percent below a year ago. The median Northeastern resale single-family home price was $276,000 in the third quarter, which is 4.8 percent below the same period in 2005.

After Elmira, N.Y., the strongest price increase in the Northeast was in Atlantic City, N.J., with a median price of $277,200, up 12.0 percent from the third quarter of last year, followed by Binghamton, N.Y., with a median price of $107,400, up 10.0 percent.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
# # #
(1) The seasonally adjusted annual rate for a particular quarter represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative sales pace for that quarter was maintained for four consecutive quarters. Total home sales include single family, townhomes, condominiums and co-operative housing. NAR began tracking the state sales series in 1981.
Seasonally adjusted rates are used in reporting quarterly data to factor out seasonal variations in resale activity. For example, sales volume normally is higher in the summer and relatively light in winter, primarily because of differences in the weather and household buying patterns.
Tables of state resale rates, percent changes and some historic data are available at the site below under Research – click on Housing Statistics, then scroll down the center to State Existing-Home Sales.
(2) Areas are generally metropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. A list of counties included in MSA definitions is available at:
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/metro-city/0312msa.txt
Regional median home prices include rural areas and samples of many smaller metros that are not included in this report; the regional percentage changes do not necessarily parallel changes in the larger metro areas. The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to seasonality in buying patterns. Quarter-to-quarter comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns.
NAR began publication of metropolitan area median single-family home prices in 1982; the metro area condo price series was launched at the beginning of 2006.
Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price sometimes is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes. As the reporting sample expands in the future, additional area will be included in the condo price report.
Tables of metropolitan area median prices, percent changes and some historic data are available at
http://www.realtor.org – under Research click on Housing Statistics, then scroll down the center to Metropolitan Area Prices.



Visit my web site for additional services and support: LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit Besthomes-NJ.com to find the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (Residential, Commercial, Multi-Family, Farm, Land).

Copyright 2006 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

NAR: Home Prices Expected To Have Limited Fall For Remainder Of 2006

WASHINGTON (September 13, 2006) –Housing prices are expected to continue to have a limited fall throughout 2006, according to testimony submitted by the National Association of Realtors®(NAR) at today’s Senate Banking Committee hearing on the economy. In addition, NAR noted that the sellers’ market is transitioning to a buyers’ market, which can be healthy for some local economies.

“For the past five years, the housing market has been a steadfast leader in the U.S. economy,” Thomas M. Stevens, president of NAR, told the Senate Subcommittee on Housing and Transportation and the Senate Subcommittee on Economic Policy. “After five years of outstanding growth, the housing market is undergoing a period of adjustment and becoming more and more of a balanced market between buyers and sellers,” said Stevens.

Stevens said that with the falling demand and increased supply, home prices still realized slight appreciation though it was less than 1 percent, where over the past few years homes were appreciating at double-digit rates. “While recent developments raise concern, it is important to remember that the housing market varies significantly across the country,” said Stevens. One-third of the country (by population) is still seeing rising home prices, including Alaska, New Mexico, Vermont and many states in the South, excluding Florida. States that experienced the greatest increases in home prices in recent years are experiencing significantly lower sales, such as Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada and Virginia.

Contrary to many reports, there is not a ‘national housing bubble,’” said Stevens. “We were seeing home prices and mortgage debt servicing cost-to-income ratios increase to unhealthy levels in some housing markets, which precipitate an adjustment.” Also contributing to the cooling housing market is an increase in mortgage rates of nearly one point, speculative investors pulling back and first-time buyers being priced out of the market.

Adjustments to the housing market are not unique and can often times be necessary, said Stevens. In addition to the rapid appreciation of years past, the rise in mortgage rates affects a homebuyer’s ability to finance and purchase a home. “Pressure is being felt in the housing market due to rising mortgage rates,” said Stevens. “With rising interest rates, homebuyers have become exhausted financially which explains why sales have tumbled in higher-priced regions of the country.”

NAR forecasts a drop in home sales of around 8 percent in 2006, followed by another 2 percent decline in 2007. These numbers are based on the stabilizing of mortgage rates and modest expansion of the economy. Also predicted is that home price growth will be minimal—less than 3 percent in 2006 and 2007. However, NAR warns that a significant shift in interest rates or a change in the economy would change this forecast. NAR notes that a soft landing is possible under the right circumstances and affordable mortgage financing is an important component in achieving this.

“Because the housing market strongly supports the economy and drives consumer spending, it is imperative that the Congress adopt policies that encourage homeownership and make purchasing a home obtainable for the millions of families who desire to own a home of their own. NAR stands ready to work with Congress to continue to open the door to the American dream of homeownership,” said Stevens.

In 2005, the housing sector directly contributed more than $2 trillion to the national economy, accounting for 16.2 percent of the economic activity, according to the NAR testimony.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.3 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
###


Source: NAR (Bold Text was added -ed.)



Visit my web site for additional resources and services: www.LawrenceYerkes.com

and visit
BestHomes-NJ.com for the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (residential, commercial, multi-family, farm, land)

Copyright 2006 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Metro Home Prices Begin to Cool but Appreciation Remains Strong

WASHINGTON – The growth in single-family home prices continued to cool in the first quarter, but many metropolitan areas are still showing double-digit annual gains, according to the latest survey by National Association of Realtors® (NAR). At the same time, metro area condo price appreciation has generally cooled to normal levels.

The association’s first-quarter metro area single-family home price report, covering changes in 149 metropolitan statistical areas,* shows 60 areas with double-digit annual increases and 16 metros experiencing price declines.

The national median existing single-family home price was $217,900 in the first quarter, up 10.3 percent from a year earlier when the median price was $197,600. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the annual rate of home-price appreciation was 13.6 percent.


David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said the market is responding to the improvements in inventory. “With the supply of homes picking up very nicely in many areas of the country, pressure is coming off of home prices,” he said. “By the time we report second quarter data, I expect most areas will be returning to normal rates of price growth in the single-digit range. Consumers generally can expect normal price appreciation for the foreseeable future, providing solid returns over time.”

Metro area condominium and cooperative prices, covering changes in 56 markets, show the national median existing condo price was $224,100 in the first quarter, up 5.2 percent from a year earlier. Twenty-seven metros showed double-digit annual gains in the median condo price, and five areas had declines.

NAR President Thomas M. Stevens said inventories have picked up more strongly in the condo sector. “Although we continue to have areas of hot growth, we’re finding more broadly balanced conditions across the country in the condo market,” said Stevens, senior vice president of NRT Inc.

“Condos have good fundamentals given the demographics of buyers, with baby boomers focused on the high end and their kids on more affordable units. However, in a handful of areas where there may be an oversupply, prices may level-out, so the longer your time horizon the better your investment,” Stevens said.

The national condo price is higher than the median single-family home price because there is a high concentration of condos in the most expensive metropolitan areas. Within a given area, the typical single-family home costs more than the median condo price.

The largest single-family home price increase was in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale area of Arizona, where the first quarter price of $268,300 rose 38.4 percent from a year ago. Next was Orlando, Fla., at $260,500, up 34.0 percent from the first quarter of 2005. Gainesville, Fla., with a first quarter median price of $210,100, increased 31.9 percent in the last year.

Median first-quarter metro area single-family prices ranged from $52,500 in Danville, Ill., to 14 times that amount in the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara area of California, where the median price was $746,800. The second most expensive area was the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont area at $720,400, followed by the Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine area (Orange Co., Calif.), at $712,600.

Other low-cost markets include, Decatur, Ill., the second least-costly metro, at $80,000, and the Youngstown-Warren-Boardman area of Ohio and Pennsylvania, with a first-quarter typical resale home price of $81,100.

In the condo sector, the strongest gains were in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale area, where the first quarter price of $179,600 rose 38.0 percent from a year ago. In the Honolulu area, the median condo price of $309,000 rose 34.9 percent from the first quarter of 2005, while Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, at $221,500, increased 31.4 percent. The condo price series will be expanded in the future as more data becomes available.

Metro area median existing condo prices ranged from $97,400 in Bismark, N.D., to $615,300 in San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont. The second most expensive reported condo market was Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, at $404,600, followed by the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos area of California at $382,200.

Other low cost condo markets include Greensboro-High Point, N.C., at $108,000, and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, at $112,800.


In the Northeast, the median resale single-family home price during the first quarter was $285,200, up 6.6 percent from a year ago. The strongest increase in the region was in Elmira, N.Y., at $88,500, up 18.8 percent from the first quarter of 2005, followed by Trenton-Ewing, N.J., with a median price of $264,900, up 17.5 percent, and Atlantic City, N.J., at $251,700, up 15.8 percent.

View Charts.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.2 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

*Areas are generally metropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. A list of counties included in MSA definitions is available at:
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/metro-city/0312msa.txt

National and regional quarterly prices have been revised back through 1989; the only revision to the metro price series is the normal annual revision for 2005 with revised fourth quarter data. The fixed reporting sample of representative multiple listing services for national and regional data has been updated to reflect geographic changes over time. In addition, regional weights have been updated and aligned to the 2000 Census, but changes in price patterns are consistent with previously reported data.

Regional median home prices include rural areas and samples of many smaller metros that are not included in this report; the regional percentage changes do not necessarily parallel changes in the larger metro areas. The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to seasonality in buying patterns. Quarter-to-quarter comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns.

NAR began publication of metropolitan area median single-family home prices in 1982; the metro area condo price series was launched earlier this year when fourth quarter 2005 data was reported.

Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes. As the reporting sample expands in the future, additional area will be included in the condo price report.

Tables of metropolitan area median prices, percent changes and some historic data are available at the site below – under Research, click on Existing Home Sales, then Metropolitan Area Prices.

Information about NAR is available at http://www.realtor.org. This and other news releases are posted in the News Media section. Statistical data, charts and surveys also may be found by clicking on Research.

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Home-Price Appreciation Stays Hot in Most Metro Areas

WASHINGTON (November 15, 2005) – Strong annual increases in median existing-home prices were common in most metropolitan areas during the third quarter, according to the latest report by National Association of Realtors® (NAR).

The association’s third-quarter median existing single-family home price survey, covering changes in 147 metropolitan statistical areas,* shows 69 areas with double-digit annual price increases. Six metros had small price declines.

The national median existing single-family home price was $215,900 in the third quarter, up 14.7 percent from the third quarter of 2004 when the median price was $188,200. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less. Ninety-seven metros – two-thirds of the total – experienced increases greater than the U.S. historic average of 6.4 percent.

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said the pace of price appreciation in the third quarter is far from being normal over time. “These historically high home price gains are the simple result of more buyers than sellers in the market,” he said. “The good news is that inventory levels are improving, and housing supply will come close to buyer demand in 2006. In other words, we expect a healthy and more balanced market next year.”

Since 1968, home prices generally have risen between 1 and 2 percentage points faster than the overall rate of inflation; the historic average price gain appears high relative to inflation because there was a period of rapid inflation in the U.S. during the 1970s and early 1980s.

NAR President Thomas M. Stevens explained what buyers and sellers generally can expect in the coming year. “Improvements in inventory in most areas should take pressure off of home buyers to make snap decisions, or find themselves in a competitive bidding situation,” said Stevens, senior vice president of NRT Inc. “This calmer real estate market will create a more level environment for buyers in weighing options to invest in the American dream of homeownership. Sellers will enjoy very healthy gains on the value of their home, but should expect annual increases to be much closer to historic levels going forward.”

Click to view Metro Prices Data

The strongest price increase in the nation was in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale area of Arizona, where the third quarter price of $268,000 rose 55.2 percent from a year earlier. Next was Orlando, Fla., at $261,300, up 44.8 percent from the third quarter of 2004. Cape Coral-Fort Meyers, Fla., with a third quarter median price of $277,600, was up 42.5 percent in the last year.

The areas experiencing price declines were lower-priced markets, with one or both of the conditions necessary for price softness – local economic weakness, primarily in jobs, or a large supply of homes for sale in the local area.


Median third-quarter metro area prices ranged from $72,800 in Danville, Ill., to nearly 10 times that amount in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont area of California where the median price was $721,900. The second most expensive area in the United States was Anaheim-Santa Ana (Orange Co., Calif.) at $710,700, followed by the Honolulu area and San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, Calif., tied at $615,000.

Other low-cost markets include, Elmira, N.Y., the second least-costly metro, at $77,100, and Decatur, Ill., with a third-quarter typical resale home price of $85,500.

Regionally, in the Northeast, the median resale home price during the third quarter was $249,300, up 13.2 percent from a year earlier. The strongest increase in the region was in the Glenn Falls, N.Y., area, at $160,000, up 25.4 percent from the third quarter of 2004, followed by Kingston, N.Y., with a median price of $259,300, up 19.8 percent, and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington area of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland, at $230,600, up 19.0 percent.

The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing more than 1.2 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.

# # #

*Areas are generally metropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. A list of counties included in MSA definitions is available at:
http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/metro-city/0312msa.txt

Regional median home prices include rural areas and samples of many smaller metros that are not included in this report; the regional percentage changes do not necessarily parallel changes in the larger metro areas. The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to seasonality in buying patterns. NAR began publication of metropolitan area median home prices in 1982.

Tables of metropolitan area median prices, percent changes and some historic data are available at the site below – under Economic & Housing Statistics, click on Existing Home Sales, then Metropolitan Area Prices.

NOTE: Beginning with the report for the fourth quarter, to be released February 15, 2006, NAR will include data on a news series for metropolitan area median condo prices. Initially, data for about 50 metros – including some historic data – will be reported. The number of MSAs covered for condo prices will be expanded over time.



Visit my web site for additional resources and services: http://www.LawrenceYerkes.com

or visit http://www.BestHomes-NJ.com for the latest New Jersey Real Estate property listings (residential, commercial, multi-family, farm, land)

Copyright 2005 by Timon, Inc. All Rights Reserved.